Data security platforms for data detection and response
Generate a controlled access or exfiltration event. Measure collection delay, alert context and the available response. Confirm which sources produce activity telemetry and which only supply scan results.
Detection & response
These platforms have documented detection & response. Confirm that capability in each required store. Environment marks do not establish that combination.
Select environment headings to prioritize coverage.
What the marks mean
- Full
- Documented support within the scope stated in the platform notes.
- Partial
- Documented support with a material limitation or integration requirement.
- None
- Evidence establishes no support.
- Unconfirmed
- The reviewed sources do not establish support. This is a research gap.
A mark does not establish every capability in every store. Microsoft 365 does not include Azure infrastructure. Warehouses groups Snowflake and Databricks. On-prem covers file shares. Coverage methodology
Select environment headings to prioritize coverage. All columns and platforms stay visible unless you apply a filter.
| Platform | Pricing | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ? | ◐ | ? | ? | ? | ? | Not published | |
Falcon Data Security for Cloud combines agentless discovery with runtime monitoring of sensitive data flows. Runtime visibility uses eBPF in the Falcon sensor. Request a store-level matrix before treating broad cloud coverage as complete. [1] [2] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationList the exact cloud storage and database engines inspected at rest. | |||||||
| ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | Not published | |
DataSunrise combines database monitoring with discovery across databases, object stores and selected collaboration tools. Discovery, masking and blocking have different deployment paths. Confirm feature support for each source. [1] [2] [4] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationSupply a per-engine matrix for discovery, activity monitoring, blocking and masking. | |||||||
| ◐ | ◐ | ? | ● | ? | ◐ | Not published | |
Forcepoint DSPM discovers and classifies data, while streaming integrations support activity monitoring. Its Microsoft 365 labeling integration writes classification results to Purview sensitivity labels. [2] [3] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationQuote DSPM, activity monitoring and DLP enforcement separately. | |||||||
| ? | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ? | ? | Not published | |
Guardium spans discovery, classification and data detection and response across multiple products. Verify the component, collection method and license behind each promised control. [1] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationWhich Guardium products and licenses are required for the proposed stores? | |||||||
| ◐ | ◐ | ? | ◐ | ? | ◐ | Not published | |
Rubrik DSPM combines classification with sensitive-data access analysis and suspicious-activity monitoring. Confirm whether each finding comes from a live source or protected data in the proposed configuration. [1] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationMap live scanning, backup classification and their refresh intervals for every source. | |||||||
| ? | ◐ | ? | ? | ◐ | ◐ | Not published | |
Sentra classifies cloud data, analyzes sharing permissions and alerts on suspicious data activity. Its scanning architecture allows both customer-owned and Sentra-owned scanner accounts. [1] [2] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationSpecify which account owns every scanner and where extracted samples and metadata are retained. | |||||||
| ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | ◐ | Not published | |
DataGuard combines classification with identity, permission and activity analysis. Symmetry describes deployment within the customer environment, including the interface. Request a store-level support matrix before treating broad cloud claims as complete coverage. [1] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationWhich connectors enumerate effective permissions and which only classify content? | |||||||
| ● | ● | ◐ | ● | ● | ◐ | Not published | |
Varonis combines content classification, effective-permission analysis and activity monitoring. Its Microsoft 365 controls include removing risky shared links and excessive access. [2] Full profileCompare with…Ask in the evaluationFor every connector, identify where file content is processed, which metadata leaves the environment and whether File Analysis or AI Monitoring changes retention. | |||||||
Confirm each capability in your specific data stores. Methodology